Good morning engineering team:
Note: This topic is ever changing because it is complex and one needs to consider more and more variables. We cannot really hope to understand it all because please tell me if you know, and can explain, why, and how, the Earth and the stars formed? Do you know what is in the afterlife if there is one? We do not know it all. Life is a mystery and must be left a mystery. However, this does not mean we should not learn, and should not expand our awareness of ourselves and the universe.
I wanted to share this link with you Population growth is the solution. The author makes the claim that the growth in population is the function of our creativity to harness resources better. For example: We invented farming equipment and thus produced more food; this lead to population growth because we could feed people that otherwise might have starved to death. Since the people did not starve they produces offspring. And so, invention, the mother of necessity, produced population expansion. The global picture is much more complex if you take into account death rates, accidents, and diseases.
We mentioned this concept in our newsletter 4-6 months before the AIER post, here: Manufacturing made life awesome. We postulated the same idea that more people is a GOOD thing not the opposite of what Santa Klaus Schwab is proposing. Please read both articles, ours and the “Malthusian Contradiction” by AIER.
Adding a response to Dave Gagnon’s article: Dave Gagnon's Article.
Definitions before you read:
Open-loop-resource economy: where consumerism is king and everything we produce goes to the dump for ages.
Closed-loop-resource economy: the opposite of open-loop-recourses. Where everything we produce gets recycled within 12 months and is put back as new, raw materials for new end products.
Which of the two above do you think is best? I’m all in for closed-loop-resources. It means nearly 100% recycled resources.
Dave Gagnon you are using too much logic, and not enough wisdom and feeling:
The author of “Malthusian Contradiction” is not saying:
(1) We need, must have, more explosive population growth all the time…
(1.a) He says use the population as-is to solve the “problems” we face.
If we cannot use the current population of minds to solve issues I guess the only logical (aka stupid solution) is to reduce the population. Wrong! Use the minds we have now. Global Reset per Klaus Schwabmob is a STUPID idea. However there are certain resets that are needed.
Banks and Communications technologies…
We need a gradual banking reset. By gradual, I mean 5 years and some few extra years as needed. We also need a communications reset. Take back the airways for the People. This includes - all radio, all cellular, all satellite, all radar. Leave a few for the government and for the military and the army to safeguard the nation just in case.
(1.b) The “problems” we face are created intentionally by bankers mainly (usurious interest rates)
(1.c) To solve these problems we need People cooperation and dissolution of government (new-old concept) world wide and back to the republic anew.
(1.d) To solve these problems we need the dissolution of all banks as they are known today.
(1.e) The world population we have today is capable if its energy is released and NOT intentionally, by various methods conscious and unconscious, restrained.
(1.f) Resources ARE unlimited actually. However, because we live in a pump-and-dump consumerist society, our resources go to the ever mushrooming DUMP. To solve this issue we need 100% recycling of all materials. Did you hear me? We need a what is called a closed-loop-resource economy: not the dig-use-throwaway model currently employed.
(1.g) When we collectively establish these points we make here, found above— 1.b, 1.d, and 1.f, things will shift drastically… FOR THE BEST.
More retorts for Dave…
Dave, the Malthusians NEVER took into account the concept of small government.
Dave, the Malthusians NEVER took seriously the concept of closed-loop-materials economy at all levels. Go look at the Oceans full of trash, etc, etc, etc…
When we say closed-loop resource recycling, we mean that every single dump globally needs to be recycled within 12 months. This is so that old resources (already mined) replenish stockpiles in warehouses ready for new products.
Can you imagine that?
Dave, the Malthusians NEVER wanted to destroy the banks and their usurious interest rate scalping methods that placed the entire globe into debt slavery and hence created a vicious cycle or perpetual debt. Enough.
Dave, the Malthusians rather opt for the expedient and easy option of depopulation and destruction of all industry rather than admit they are incorrect. This is a psychological, spiritual, impediment; and so, we cannot hold our breath and wait for them.
Dave, you are living in a delusional reality. Just be honest, brutally honest with yourself.
Dave you are probably a very, very logical computer scientist guy, but you lack a very vital part of your mind, likely under utilized: the wisdom and feeling part.
Critical Feeling is key.
All the Best,
The FlunkedIn Team-Powerhouse networks.
Another article was put out and contradicted us. We will see if we could respond to that article. Here is the link to it: http://www.321gold.com/editorials/guest/gagnon121222.html ... Dave Gagnon the author of Malthusian Contradiction is NOT saying we need more population growth. He is saying use the current population, as is, to solve the problems. But, for that to happen lots of GOVERNMENT regulations across the globe must to go to the trash can. You need to use some wisdom here not just computer science logic.
More people is a bad thing only if they are all uneducated consumers of products in a open-loop-resource economy.